The present paper deals with Bartholomae’s Law in Indo-Iranian languages. After a new examination of the data, it concludes that in the case of Bartholomae’s Law, there is no assumed ʽtransfer of aspiration ʼ or any other similar process but that the attested plosives are the result of a process of plosivization of the original Indo-Iranian voiced fricatives Δ (< IE *Dh). Thus, the process described by Bartholomae is not an exception in developing of plosive clusters but a regular process affecting the original fricatives, plosives in the outcome clusters being of secondary origin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ondřej Šefčík (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: