The article presents a discussion of the results of laboratory experiments on social coordination that allowed various forms of reasoning to be used. The experiments were conducted in the TIG laboratory at the University of Primorska. We investigate the type of reasoning the participants used while making decisions in the laboratory. In particular, two contemporary theories of coordination are tested, the first describing a team-oriented and the second an individual-oriented type of thinking. The participants’ coordination behaviour shows that young people hold the potential to develop both some form of cooperative reasoning and a more individualistic, boundedly rational focus on their own success, such as referred to in cognitive hierarchy theory. Instead of team reasoning, we find evidence in support for a simpler, albeit less profitable odd-one-out heuristic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aljaž Ule (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: