This analysis evaluates GARCH models for exchange rate volatility in Nigeria, suggesting implications for monetary policy.
This study examines exchange rate volatility with Generalized Autoregressive Conditional heteroscedastic (GARCH) models using daily exchange rate data obtained from the central bank of Nigeria between 1st January 2017 and 31st December 2019. The ARCH LM test of the mean equation revealed the presence of conditional heteroscedasticity. The returns were modeled using ARCH (3), GARCH (2,2), Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (EGARCH) (3,2), and Threshold Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (TGARCH) (1,1). The results revealed that EGARCH (3,2) was the best since it has the least AIC of -24.3197 and SIC of -24.2741. A diagnostic test of the EGARCH (3,2) model residuals with Ljung-Box and the ARCH LM tests revealed that the models were free from higher order autocorrelation and conditional heteroscedasticity respectively. The parameters of the EGARCH (3,2) model were significant and the positive value of the leverage parameter is an indication of absence of leverage effect in the returns of Naira-Dollar exchange rate. The absence of the leverage effect in the exchange rate indicates that positive shocks increase volatility than negative shocks of equal magnitude. Thus, the implication is that strengthening the Dollar (weakening the Naira) leads to higher period volatility than when the Naira is strengthened by the same amount. It is recommended that the central bank should put in place long-term measures to stabilize the Naira since weakening the Naira increases the uncertainty in the exchange market than strengthening the Naira.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olumi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: