PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Education as Change0 citationsOpen Access

Papering over the Cracks

View Full Paper
UHUrsula Hoadley

Key Points

  • Curriculum coverage and learning losses worsened existing educational disadvantage in South Africa.
  • The national CAPS curriculum was modified by trimming content and focusing on fundamental knowledge, directly impacting assessments.
  • Post-COVID policies saw a shift of decision-making power to schools, but did not effectively address learning recovery.
  • Remote learning solutions were promoted by authorities, yet access remained highly unequal, particularly in low-income communities.

Abstract

This article documents curriculum and assessment policy changes over four years (2020 to 2024) in South Africa in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and school closures. Early on, some changes were made to the national CAPS curriculum documents in the form of trimming content (2020), identifying “fundamental” knowledge (2020), and reviewing subject content (2022). The focus was on retaining the curriculum while allowing for flexibility in coverage through weakened controls over moderation, assessment, and promotion requirements, ceding most curriculum and assessment decisions to the school and classroom levels. Given a very unequal system, this meant that curriculum coverage and learning losses mapped onto and deepened pre-COVID-19 patterns of educational disadvantage. Post-COVID, a similar approach of devolution of curriculum decision-making to school and teacher level was taken. There were no attempts to recoup time in order to remediate learning losses, apart from later attempts in one province. Post-COVID, the Department of Basic Education tightened controls over coverage again but maintained leniency with respect to assessment and progression. During the pandemic the Department of Basic Education claimed remote solutions as a key mechanism for addressing curriculum coverage, despite very few learners having access to these. There were few mechanisms to address the severe educational impact of the pandemic, especially on learners in the poorest communities. The article argues that rather than address learning losses directly government strategies have masked them.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ursula Hoadley (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1c24454b1d3bfb60f00b8https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/17665
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper