Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework develops a human-activity-sensitive indicator for vegetation coverage, suggesting its patterns reflect human influence more than natural resources.
To restore and rebuild degraded ecosystems, the Chinese government has implemented a series of ecological projects that have led to significant increases in vegetation coverage and transformations in landscape patterns. Traditional surface indices, such as the vegetation coverage degree (VCD), primarily reflect natural resource endowments and fail to adequately capture the influence of human interventions, thereby limiting their effectiveness in detecting changes resulting from restoration efforts. To address this gap, we aimed to develop a comprehensive analytical framework by introducing a human‐activity‐sensitive indicator, the vegetation coverage potential achievement degree (VCPAD). This framework fully considers the impacts of natural resource endowments and human efforts on vegetation coverage patterns. The results show that in Yan'an, China, VCD has been improving since the implementation of the grain for green (GFG) project, but its spatial pattern consistently exhibits north–south differences. In contrast, although the VCPAD initially exhibited high positive spatial autocorrelation, its strength gradually weakened over time. These observations suggest that the VCD patterns are strongly determined by resource endowments, whereas those of the VCPAD are much more sensitive to changes driven by human activities. Finally, through a joint evolution analysis of Moran's I of both VCD and VCPAD, it was found that 13 county‐level units in Yan'an could be categorized into forest zones, traditional farming zones, and agropastoral zones. Overall, this study offers a novel and effective framework for understanding and evaluating the effects and impacts of ecological projects from a spatial pattern perspective, providing a foundation for the ecological restoration zoning and the formulation of localized vegetation restoration measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: