Essay discusses non-linear temporal models in historiography, suggesting they may enrich historical understanding.
If the bridge between the dimensions of past, present, and future has become as uncertain as the very notion that history follows a linear trajectory, alternative ways of engaging with the past are gaining increasing significance. This essay explores how non-(uni)linear conceptions of time can offer a more nuanced understanding of historical and contemporary worlds. Rather than adhering to monolithic categories of past, present, and future connected by a single developmental line, it proposes metaphors such as the fold, the loop, or the swirl and their respective verbs – each reflecting distinct temporal experiences. By linking these metaphorical perspectives to the everyday practice of historians, the essay examines how such non-(uni)linear approaches not only add value to historiography but may also offer a way out of the uncertain terrain of historicity, thereby stimulating praxeological reflections on historiography in the 21st century.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sina Steglich (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: