Observational analysis shows increased crop diversification and improved land use in villages, indicating effective agricultural interventions.
Assam's agricultural sector is diverse, with rice as the dominant crop alongside pulses, oilseeds and vegetables. Udalguri district, situated in the North Bank Plain Zone, faces challenges such as limited irrigation, low mechanization and restricted market access. Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Udalguri, has implemented interventions in two adopted villages i.e Kacharital and Habigaon, aiming to improve the status of agriculture through enhancing productivity and optimize cropping patterns. However, variability in farmer adoption rates and climatic uncertainties posed difficulties in assessing long-term sustainability. This study analyses the impact of KVK’s interventions on crop area expansion, production trends and diversification between 2018-19 to 2022-23 for Kacharital and 2015- 16 to 2022-23 for Habigaon. Data was gathered through farmer interviews, Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) and Focus Group Discussions (FGD), and analysed using statistical tools such as Percentage Change, Coefficient of Variation, Simpson’s Index of Diversification (SID) and Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR). Findings reveal a shift towards diversified cropping. Rice cultivation declined (-5.26 ha in Kacharital, -6.36 ha in Habigaon) due to water constraints and market shifts. Pulses, oilseeds and vegetables expanded significantly, improving farm income and soil fertility. Cropping intensity increased from 100.35% to 155.07% in Kacharital and from 106.53% to 129.84% in Habigaon, reflecting better land utilization. The Simpson Index of Diversification rose to 0.55 in Kacharital and 0.53 in Habigaon, highlighting adaptive farming practices. This study contributes to the understanding of how targeted interventions influence cropping diversification, demonstrating that strategic support can improve land-use efficiency and farmer resilience despite systemic constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: