This analysis critiques the DIGC framework for defining disinformation in attitudes, suggesting it misrepresents creators' intentions.
This paper engages with the knowledge-first, dispositional account proposed by Simion (Citation2023), which conceptualises disinformation as ignorance generating content (DIGC). In the first part of the paper, I outline the central features of the account, before raising several concerns that challenge its explanatory adequacy. In particular, the main claim of this paper is that the DIGC account over-generates disinformation and that this problem results from its attempt to define disinformation independently of non-epistemic aspects, particularly considerations regarding the intentions of those who create and disseminate false or misleading content. Finally, I address potential objections and conclude that, although Simion's proposal is both original and promising, its current formulation leads to problematic implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca Ausili (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: