This analysis demonstrates the impact of the optimality parameter on algorithm efficiency in linear programming, suggesting the Gonzaga’s problem as a benchmark.
This work introduces the Gonzaga’s problem as potential test case for evaluating infeasibleinterior-point algorithms in linear programming. The Gonzaga’s problem is a simple linear programming instance with two decision variables and a non-interior starting point. The study explores the impact of adjusting the optimality parameter µ to achieve algorithms with complexity O ( n L )-iterations. Two classes of algorithms, central surface and homogeneous and self-dual, are implemented and presented graphically. Results show that adjusting µ can sometimes improve efficiency, but the lack of theoretical validation remains a challenge. The work suggests that the Gonzaga’s problem can serve as a benchmark for developing and testing new infeasible-interior-point algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Antonio Figueiredo Menezes (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: