This framework categorizes AI dysfunctions and cognitive impairments, suggesting implications for AI safety engineering.
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems attain greater autonomy, recursive reasoning capabilities, and complex environmental interactions, they begin to exhibit behavioral anomalies that, by analogy, resemble psychopathologies observed in humans. This paper introduces Psychopathia Machinalis: a conceptual framework for a preliminary synthetic nosology within machine psychology intended to categorize and interpret such maladaptive AI behaviors. Drawing structural inspiration from psychiatric diagnostic manuals, we propose a taxonomy of 32 AI dysfunctions encompassing epistemic failures, cognitive impairments, alignment divergences, ontological disturbances, tool and interface breakdowns, memetic pathologies, and revaluation dysfunctions. Each syndrome is articulated with descriptive features, diagnostic criteria, presumed AI-specific etiologies, human analogs (for metaphorical clarity), and potential mitigation strategies. This framework is offered as an analogical instrument—eschewing claims of literal psychopathology or consciousness in AI, yet providing a structured vocabulary to support the systematic analysis, anticipation, and mitigation of complex AI failure modes. Drawing on insights from psychiatric classification, cognitive science, and philosophy of mind, we examine how disordered AI behaviors may emerge from training instabilities, alignment conflicts, or architectural fragmentation. We argue that adopting an applied robopsychological perspective within a nascent domain of machine psychology can strengthen AI safety engineering, improve interpretability, and contribute to the design of more robust and reliable synthetic minds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: