This article theorizes mechanisms shaping the genomic economy, exploring traits and financial instruments' impact on regulation.
This article theorizes the emergence of a genomic marketplace in which traits—from disease resistance to enhanced cognition—are priced, licensed, and traded as proprietary assets. We introduce two mechanisms that organize value capture in this economy: inherited revenue assurance (IRA), a lineage-binding royalty structure for germline edits, and genomic asset–backed securities (GABS), financial instruments that securitize expected royalty cashflows from edited populations. We build a conceptual model of the trait value chain—from IP origination through multigenerational licensing and secondary finance—and analyze distributional and ethical consequences under competing regulatory regimes (patent exclusivity, FRAND-style licensing, royalty caps, and trait commons). The contribution is a political–economy account that connects molecular IP to household welfare and macro–finance, while offering policy tests that distinguish emancipatory from extractive designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joshua Luberisse (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: