Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation reveals that AMPERE's magnetic perturbations align closely with Swarm data, suggesting high accuracy.
The Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE) provides continuous global maps of Birkeland currents, using magnetic field perturbations (d B ) obtained by calibrating and detrending data from engineering magnetometers on the 66 polar‐orbiting Iridium satellites in the communications constellation. Here, we provide an assessment of AMPERE d B accuracy, as compared with magnetic field observations from the Swarm satellite mission. The CHAOS v8.1 model (Finlay et al., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623‐020‐01252‐9 ) was used to remove the main field and other non‐ionospheric contributions from both data sets. In a nearest‐neighbor comparison covering August 2022, AMPERE's calibrated and detrended d B data from the Iridium NEXT satellites are found to have root‐mean‐square deviations of 31 and 33 nT (for d B θ and d B φ , respectively) as compared with data from Swarm, while the biases are −7 and −2 nT. For the same interval, AMPERE's fitted maps have root‐mean‐square errors of <40 nT, rising to 109–185 nT in active conditions (defined as Swarm d B > 250 nT). However, there is evidence that small scale (<400‐km along Swarm track direction) d B structures are not fully resolved. Overall, we find that the AMPERE d B data and fitted products are unbiased and are typically in excellent agreement with the Swarm data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chartier et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: