Mixed methods analysis reveals socio-economic struggles of IDPs in Marawi conflict aftermath, highlighting human rights violations.
The study aimed to describe the transitional justice mechanisms and their implementation in the Marawi Siege Post-Conflict. It used mixed methods of quantitative and qualitative. The respondents of the study were the internally displaced persons (IDPs) and key players in the post-Marawi Siege conflict. Descriptive statistics and Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient were used as statistical tools to analyze data in this study. The study found that the majority of the respondents are middle-aged adults with a substantial proportion of the respondents being female, married with educational attainment; however, the majority of the respondents are unemployed and jobless. They belong to low-income to poor socioeconomic classes with an average monthly income of Php 4,500. The respondents are from the 24 barangays, also called Ground Zero of Marawi City. Basic rights to get their way of life and livelihood are an injustice experienced by the IDPs, which the majority of the respondents agreed. Looting is another form of human rights violation experienced. In terms of legitimate grievances, they deem the failure of the government to support the socio-economic development of IDPs. Prostitution and other illegal trade of business is, unaddressed issue of the IDPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
RAIMA Dimaampao (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: