Experimental analysis shows torque output varies with rope material in a capstan system, indicating optimization potential.
Aim: This study explores a mechanical torque booster’s development and performance evaluation based on the capstan principle. The system amplifies torque by utilizing a rope wound around a motor-driven drum, where friction and the number of rope loops determine the force required to lift a load. Methods and Statistical Analysis: A gear train is employed to achieve the desired counter-rotational motion of the drums, optimizing power transmission. The system’s components were designed using theoretical approaches and validated through strength analysis. Modeling was conducted in Unigraphix NX- 8, while structural analysis was performed using Ansys Workbench 16.0. The fabricated system underwent testing to assess its performance, with a comparative evaluation of two rope materials—leather and cotton. Experimental results indicate that with a cotton rope, the highest torque output of 3.3 watts was achieved at 86 rpm, with a power amplification factor ranging from 1.42 to 2.14. In contrast, the leather rope demonstrated superior performance, reaching a maximum torque of 3.7 watts at 86 rpm and a power amplification factor between 1.44 and 2.319. The findings highlight the influence of material properties on torque amplification, providing valuable insights for optimizing mechanical power transmission systems. Major Findings: This study develops a mechanical torque booster using the capstan technique, enhancing torque and power output through a rope-wound motor-driven drum. Experimental analysis comparing leather and cotton ropes revealed superior performance of the leather rope, achieving a maximum power amplification factor of 2.32 at 97.4 rpm. Results highlight the system’s efficiency in mechanical positioning and load-lifting, emphasizing the impact of rope material, spin count, and rotational speed on performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohite et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: