This study demonstrates the diagnostic accuracy of FEV3/FEV6 for COPD in 200 subjects, suggesting its applicability in resource-limited settings.
Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presents a major global health burden. While FEV1/FVC is the diagnostic gold standard, its application is limited by patient compliance and procedural complexity. FEV3/FEV6 has been proposed as a simpler alternative for early COPD screening, but its diagnostic and prognostic value remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of FEV3/FEV6 in diagnosing mild to moderate COPD and predicting patient outcomes. Methods A total of 200 patients suspected of having mild to moderate COPD underwent FEV3/FEV6 and FEV1/FVC testing from June 2019 to June 2021 and were followed for 3 years. Correlation analysis and ROC curve analysis were conducted. Results FEV6 correlated strongly with FVC ( r = 0.981) and FEV3/FEV6 with FEV1/FVC ( r = 0.928). FEV3/FEV6 showed high diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.953; sensitivity 87.92%; specificity 84.77%) and prognostic relevance (AUC = 0.783; sensitivity 80.3%; specificity 66.2%). Conclusion FEV3/FEV6 is a reliable tool for early diagnosis and prognosis assessment in mild to moderate COPD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: