Cross-sectional analysis reveals DaTSCAN z-scores predict levodopa requirements, suggesting potential biomarkers for personalized treatment in Parkinson's disease.
Precision medicine driven by clinical biomarkers is the state-of-art management approach for Parkinson's disease (PD). Whether pattern of striatal dopaminergic deficiency (demonstrated by single-photon emission CT (SPECT) scanning with 123I-Ioflupane, DaTSCAN) could be a biomarker predicting levodopa requirement in early PD is not known. Participants with early PD (disease duration (DD) ≤ 5 years, Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) ≤ 3) who underwent DaTSCAN as a part of clinical-diagnostic work up and were enrolled in the "Non-motor Longitudinal International Study" (UK National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network Number 10084) were included in this cross-sectional analysis. Specific DaTSCAN binding ratios were analyzed for each striatum, caudate nucleus and putamen and the z-scores were derived normalizing the images to age and gender-matched healthy controls from the European-Database-of-DaTSCAN-of-healthy-controls (ENC-DAT). Using linear regression analysis, we explored the impact of DaT-uptake z-scores for more severely affected putamen, caudate nucleus and striatum on the LEDD. Statistically significant predictors identified in the univariable analysis were included in the multivariable analysis with DD and H&Y as additional independent variables. 43 PwP (30% female; age: 61.91 ± 11.45years; DD: 2(0-5) years; H&Y: 2(1-3); LEDD: 424.27 ± 342.62 mg) were assessed 19.12 ± 13.11 months following the DaTSCAN. In a multivariable linear regression analysis, when adjusted for DD and H&Y, z-caudate nucleus (B=-134.073, 95% CI -262.715 - -5.431, p = 0.042) and z-striatum (B=-162.137, 95% CI -306.306 - -17.967, p = 0.028), were statistically significant predictors of LEDD, while z-putamen was not (p = 0.086). In early PD, striatal DaT-uptake z-scores may serve as biomarkers that could aid the LEDD estimation and guide treatment decisions towards personalized care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rukavina et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: