PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Cancer Cell37 citationsOpen Access

Fc-optimized CD40 agonistic antibody elicits tertiary lymphoid structure formation and systemic antitumor immunity in metastatic cancer

View Full Paper
JOJuan C. OsorioDKDavid A. KnorrPWPolina Weitzenfeld

Key Points

  • i.t. 2141-V11 promotes systemic antitumor immunity, leading to tumor reduction in melanoma and breast cancer patients.
  • Tumor regression was observed in six patients, including two who achieved complete responses, demonstrating significant efficacy.
  • Treatment with 2141-V11 corresponded with systemic CD8+ T cell activation and the formation of mature tertiary lymphoid structures.
  • The findings suggest that 2141-V11 is safe, offering potential for developing long-lasting immune memory against tumors.

Abstract

CD40 agonism enhances antitumor immunity but is limited by systemic toxicity and poor efficacy. Here, we present a phase 1 study (NCT04059588) of intratumoral (i.t.) 2141-V11, an Fc-engineered anti-CD40 agonistic antibody with enhanced binding to the inhibitory receptor FcγRIIB. Among 12 metastatic cancer patients, 2141-V11 was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities. Six patients experienced tumor reduction, including two complete responses in melanoma and breast cancer. 2141-V11 induced regression in injected and non-injected lesions, correlating with systemic CD8+ T cell activation and mature tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) in complete responders. In CD40/FcγRs humanized mice bearing orthotopic tumors, i.t. 2141-V11 promoted de novo TLS formation, facilitating i.t. CD8+ T cell effector responses independent of lymph node priming. The resulting local immune responses by 2141-V11 mediated abscopal antitumor effects and sustained immune memory. These findings demonstrate that i.t. 2141-V11 is safe and promotes immune-privileged tumor microenvironments that promote systemic and durable antitumor immunity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Osorio et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1c9d254b1d3bfb60f2aa7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2025.07.013
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis2017 · 9,069 citations
  2. 2Response Criteria for Intratumoral Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors: itRECIST2020 · 75 citations
  3. 3A phase II study of dacetuzumab (SGN-40) in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and correlative analyses of patient-specific factors2014 · 104 citations
  4. 4Abstract CT203: Fc-optimized anti-CD40 agonist antibody 2141-V11 for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: Updates on phase 1 study clinical outcomes and biological correlatives2025 · 2 citations
  5. 5FcγRIV: A Novel FcR with Distinct IgG Subclass Specificity2005 · 660 citations