This method determines surface tension from interfacial curvature using linear regression, emphasizing the Young–Laplace relation.
We develop a new linear-regression-based method for determining surface tension, γ, from interfacial curvature. Across a static fluid–fluid interface, γ is balanced by the difference in hydrostatic pressure, ΔP. The balance is described by the Young–Laplace relation: ΔP = γ (k1 + k2), where k1 + k2 is the sum of the principal interfacial curvatures. Along the interface, ΔP varies linearly with elevation. It has been assumed that, even when there is surfactant at the interface, γ is constant along the interface. If this assumption is correct, then, according to the Young–Laplace relation, k1 + k2 must also vary linearly with elevation. For images of a constrained sessile droplet and a captive bubble, each with an interfacial dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) monolayer that is compressed to varying degrees, we determine the offset in ΔP from that at a reference elevation, ΔP – ΔPo, and k1 + k2 at interfacial points of different elevations. We find that k1 + k2 indeed varies linearly with elevation. Thus, if we plot ΔP – ΔPo versus k1 + k2, we obtain a linear plot with a slope equal to γ. We develop and make available an algorithm for determining γ by linear regression. And we assess accuracy by comparison to γ values determined by axisymmetric drop shape analysis. For a droplet or bubble with a DPPC monolayer, over a γ range of 2–70 mN/m, the absolute value of the difference in γ determined by the alternative methods averages 0.30 ± 0.37 mN/m. Further, while we apply the method to axisymmetric interfaces and make use of axisymmetry to determine the curvature from two-dimensional images, the underlying theory does not require axisymmetry. With 3D volumetric imaging, the method could potentially be extended to more complex interfacial geometries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perlman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: