This OSCE examined breastfeeding skills in clerkship students, suggesting improvements in lactation education are needed.
Breastfeeding provides significant health benefits for families and cost-saving potential for health care systems. Physician support is crucial to lactation success. However, lactation education curricula across the US do not reliably meet published standards, and educators lack a standardized tool to assess student competency. We developed a breastfeeding-focused OSCE for UME learners that assesses students' application of lactation knowledge in clinical settings. This lactation OSCE for medical students includes a patient interview, postencounter note, and evaluation by a trained standardized patient (SP). OSCE performance was compared between clerkship students who participated in a pilot lactation curriculum and students who did not participate in this curriculum. Primary outcome was correct identification of primary diagnosis. Secondary outcomes included postencounter note total score, history score, management/counseling score, and SP communication score. Data were analyzed using bivariate statistics. Twenty-eight students completed the OSCE, of whom 15 (54%) participated in the pilot lactation curriculum. Pilot students were more likely than nonpilot students to correctly identify the primary diagnosis (73% vs. 31%, p = .02), score higher on management/counseling (median 4.0 [IQR: 4.0, 6.0] vs. 4.0 [IQR: 2.0, 4.0], p = .04), and communicate better (73% vs. 63%, p = .002), and also nearly twice as likely to score ≥50th percentile overall (73% vs. 39%, p = .06) and have higher total postencounter note scores (median 22.0 [IQR: 20.0, 26.0] vs. 19.0 [IQR: 18.0, 22.0], p = .18). This OSCE effectively assesses UME learners' ability to clinically apply lactation knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: