Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative investigation reveals absorption rates of aryl-eOPEs are significantly lower than tOPEs, suggesting serious health risks.
As substitutes for traditional organophosphate esters (tOPEs), the safety of emerging aryl-OPEs (aryl-eOPEs) requires further evaluation. Understanding their fates in organisms is crucial for assessing potential toxicity and health risks. This study quantitatively investigated the toxicokinetics of four aryl-eOPEs and compared them with tOPEs in Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 72) over a 20-day gavage exposure followed by a 9-day elimination period. The absorption rates of aryl-eOPEs (8.95-28.0%) were approximately 1/2 to 1/10 those of tOPEs (61.9-96.8%), with hydrophobicity and molecular weight being key impact factors. The total concentration of aryl-eOPEs in feces was nearly double that of tOPEs, yet only 6.86-23.6% resulted from metabolic clearance in rats. Most administered aryl-eOPEs were not absorbed by the body and were directly excreted via feces. However, the half-lives of aryl-eOPEs in rats were generally longer than those of tOPEs, with bisphenol A bis(diphenyl phosphate) exhibiting the longest half-life (2.68-6.59 days), highlighting their potential health risks. Additionally, significant pulmonary accumulation of aryl-eOPEs was observed, with the liver, kidneys, and small intestines playing key roles in metabolism and clearance. This study elucidates the toxicokinetic behavior of aryl-eOPEs in mammals and highlights the influence of their physicochemical properties. These findings provide a scientific foundation for assessing their potential health effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: