Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis reveals empagliflozin's potential to reduce cardiotoxicity in doxorubicin patients, indicating its therapeutic mechanisms involve RIP3 and TLR4 pathways.
Doxorubicin (DOX), a widely used chemotherapeutic agent, is associated with dose-dependent cardiotoxicity that limits its clinical application. Emerging evidence implicates that receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIP3) and the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88)/nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) signaling pathway play pivotal roles in DOX-induced cardiac inflammation and cell death. Empagliflozin, an sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, has shown potential cardioprotective effects independent of its glucose-lowering actions. This study investigated the cardioprotective role of empagliflozin in DOX-induced myocardial injury, with a focus on the mechanistic involvement of RIP3-mediated signaling.Using a murine DOX-induced cardiotoxicity model and H9C2 cardiomyocytes, empagliflozin was found to significantly attenuate DOX-induced cardiac dysfunction, histopathological damage, and oxidative stress. DOX administration led to upregulation of RIP3 and activation of the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway, accompanied by increased markers of apoptosis and ferroptosis. Empagliflozin treatment reversed these molecular changes. In vitro overexpression of RIP3 exacerbated DOX-induced inflammatory signaling and cardiomyocyte injury, while empagliflozin effectively mitigated these effects.These findings suggest that empagliflozin protects against DOX-induced myocardial injury by suppressing RIP3-dependent activation of the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby reducing both apoptotic and ferroptotic cell death. This study provides novel insight into the mechanism of empagliflozin-mediated cardioprotection and identifies RIP3 as a potential therapeutic target for DOX-induced cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: