NMR spectroscopy reveals client partitioning dynamics in biomolecular condensates, suggesting regulatory roles for post-translational modifications.
Biomolecular condensates enrich specific client molecules while excluding others, often modulating conformational landscapes, and hence functions, of molecules dissolved within them. NMR-based atomic resolution studies have focused on interactions between scaffold proteins and the unfolded states of client proteins to understand the factors that influence client partitioning into condensed phases. However, characterization of interactions involving the folded client conformer is required to obtain a complete picture of how dissolution within the condensed phase affects the client energy landscape. Here, we use solution NMR spectroscopy to investigate, at atomic resolution, the interactions mediating the selective partitioning of a folded client, the FUS RNA Recognition Motif (RRM), into condensates formed by the scaffold protein CAPRIN1. At 40 °C, approximately 40% of FUS RRM remains folded in the CAPRIN1 condensed phase and high-resolution [1H-15N]-HSQC spectra can be recorded, enabling site-specific interactions between the folded client and scaffold to be mapped across the entire FUS RRM sequence. Using intermolecular NOE and PRE (mixed solutions), and chemical shift perturbation (demixed solution) analyses, we identify a set of interaction surfaces on the folded FUS RRM that enable multiple contacts with aromatic- and arginine-rich regions of CAPRIN1. These heterotypic interactions lead to a 30-fold enrichment of FUS RRM within the condensate and overlap with sites responsible for CAPRIN1 homotypic phase separation, suggesting a shared molecular basis for scaffold-scaffold and scaffold-client recognition. Notably, tyrosine phosphorylation of CAPRIN1 disrupts these interactions and reduces client partitioning by over 2 orders of magnitude, highlighting how post-translational modifications can profoundly regulate condensate composition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: