Mixed-methods analysis reveals a strong link between student agency and academic success in learning environments, suggesting a new architectural design approach.
Background: Traditional pedagogies often fail to foster intrinsic motivation, creating a need for scalable models that produce predictable outcomes without constant teacher intervention. This study introduces "Daring Pedagogy," an architectural approach for designing self-regulating learning environments to address this gap.Methods: Using a mixed-methods longitudinal design, we analyzed Smartupiad, a system of voluntary team-based mathematics tournaments. The study covers 15,675 participation cases from 2,612 primary students over three years. Quantitative performance data were triangulated with qualitative teacher interviews to identify key mechanisms.Findings: The model effectively activates student learning potential. A near-deterministic relationship was found between sustained voluntary participation and a high probability of academic success. Inter-class competition emerged as a key mechanism, fostering intra-class psychological safety and "collective courage" that drives exceptional student progress.Contribution: This work extends Self-Determination Theory by offering a systemic model where support for autonomy is embedded into the learning architecture, providing a scalable alternative to teacher-centric interventions. It contributes an empirically validated, predictable framework to the Learning Sciences for designing educational ecosystems that foster genuine student agency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalmakov et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: