Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights discordance in intraoperative EEG monitoring, suggesting integrating raw EEG and density spectral array for improved clinical outcomes.
Intraoperative electroencephalography (EEG) is increasingly used to monitor the depth of anesthesia and a range of other perioperative indications. While processed EEG indices offer a convenient numerical representation, exclusive reliance on these values can obscure clinically significant findings. Discordance between the numerical index and the raw EEG or density spectral array (DSA) may arise due to artifacts, patient-specific neurophysiology, or pharmacologic effects. This article highlights common sources of such discordance, illustrated through clinical examples, and emphasizes the importance of integrating raw EEG interpretation and DSA analysis into routine intraoperative monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: