Qualitative analysis reveals how COVID-19 intensified gendered expectations and professional precarity among Indian women lawyers.
The COVID-19 pandemic has redefined the legal landscape through virtual hearings and remote work, placing Indian women lawyers at a critical juncture of professional precarity and gendered expectations at home. Existing scholarship highlights the challenges women face in asserting legal identities within a male-dominated profession; the pandemic has amplified these tensions. This study draws on narrative interviews with 50 female lawyers practicing at the Calcutta High Court, exploring how digital courts and work-from-home routines have disrupted their spatial autonomy, deepened unpaid care responsibilities, and renegotiated their professional identities. Through qualitative analysis, the research traces how respondents navigate diminished case opportunities, blurred public-private boundaries, and entrenched patriarchal norms. The findings illuminate how pandemic-era legal adaptations have intensified existing gender inequities, prompting urgent questions about recognition, access, and agency in contemporary Indian legal practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sinha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: