Photoelasticity tests reveal how metamaterial implants reduce stress shielding in bones, suggesting new design possibilities.
Does the material of an implant contribute to stress shielding in reconstructed bones, or is stress shielding driven mainly by loads transferred through fixation screws? Can the replacement of solid parts in an implant with porous metamaterials effectively reduce stress shielding despite the presence of the screws? We propose a photoelasticity approach to answer these questions directly and illustrate it on conventional (solid) and metamaterial (porous) personalized mandibular implants with identical screws.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heins et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: