Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proposed model improves flood inundation extraction accuracy to 98.79% in challenging environments, suggesting effective real-time solutions.
To address high computational costs and prolonged training in conventional water body recognition models (e.g., Swin Transformer, DeepLabV3+), we propose a lightweight network replacing DeepLabV3 + 's backbone with Mobile-Former. Mobile-Former achieves bidirectional fusion of local and global features via parallel MobileNetV3 and Transformer blocks. The model extracts a shallow feature and two deep features, with one deep feature processed by dilated convolution before fusion with the shallow feature and the remaining deep feature. This design reduces FLOPs from 219,300.75 to 3,727.14 M and parameters from 351.56 to 12.21 M. Experimental results show average IoU scores of 67.98, 69.86, and 91.81% on three datasets. The lightweight architecture enables real-time processing and suits resource-constrained environments. Validation on 2020 Chaohu flood data demonstrates 98.79% accuracy in flood inundation extraction, highlighting its practical efficacy for disaster response applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: