Analytical framework establishes strong and weak HRTFs in modeling spatial hearing, highlighting perceptual adequacy and listener feedback.
This article introduces an analytical framework for modeling head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) from a listener-centered perspective. The distinction between strong (or general) HRTFs, aiming for idealized physical acoustic fidelity, and weak (or narrow) HRTFs, prioritizing perceptual adequacy in task-specific contexts, frames the contrast in multiple distinctive definitions and scientific methodologies by drawing inspiration from the debate in artificial intelligence. The proposed formalism adopts a Bayesian structure that models HRTFs through a state-space formulation capturing anatomical, contextual, experiential, and task-related factors: the eHRTF. The “e” emphasizes the egocentric perspective, transforming HRTFs from static measurements into mutable auditory representations continuously updated through the listener's feedback. Satisfaction regions are defined in probabilistic terms and characterize how different classes of HRTFs, i.e., individual, generic, super, and personalized, meet perceptual requirements under varying tasks and their complexity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michele Geronazzo (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: