Although there are known differences in mechanisms of thermoregulation between males and females, it is unclear whether or how these alter physiological adaptations during heat acclimation. Our goal was to evaluate possible sex differences in responses to a ten-day controlled work rate heat acclimation (HA) protocol. We studied 27 young healthy individuals (16 females). Volunteers underwent ten days of HA at a controlled work rate (walking at 5km·hr -1 , 2% grade, 40⁰C, 40% relative humidity, 1.34m·s -1 windspeed for 120 minutes). Core temperature (T core ) and heart rate (HR) were measured continuously. Whole body sweat rate (WBSR) was calculated from pre- and post-exercise nude body mass. Blood samples were taken pre-exercise on days 1 and 10 (HAD1 and HAD10) to evaluate HSP72. Males and females successfully (and similarly) adapted to HA, as assessed by progressive decreases in peak T core (males: HAD1 38.69±0.48 vs. HAD10 38.30±0.28, p<0.001; females: HAD1 38.90±0.49 vs. HAD10 38.46±0.45 ºC, p<0.001). Peak HR was higher in females throughout HA, but adapted to HA in both groups (males: HAD1 141±16 vs. HAD10 127±11, p<0.001; females: HAD1 170±17 vs. HAD10 152±17 bpm, p<0.001) WBSR increased in both groups (males: HAD1 0.73±0.23 vs. HAD10 0.92±0.23, p<0.001; females: HAD1 0.65±0.15 vs. HAD10 0.72±0.12 L·hr -1 , p=0.041) but was higher in male on HAD3-HAD5. Across HA, HSP72 increased similarly between males and females. These results suggest that males and females have a similar ability to adapt to a 10-day exercise-HA protocol but appear to do so via distinct physiological mechanisms.
Giersch et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: