Analysis reveals post-true crime's unique narrative codes and social functions, highlighting its impact on media and empathy.
It has become a truism to speak of a resurgence in true crime media. Attention has turned to the various ways that the true crime of "boom" of the late 2010s–present, enmeshed in a new media economy with implications for access; participation; distribution; and prestige, is or is not distinct from the genre's past. Utilizing the YouTube series "Murder, Mystery and Makeup" as an exemplar, I argue for recognition of a "post-true crime" genre, developing the term from Bolin. Building on Punnett's establishment of the narratological codes of true crime, I argue that post-true crime incorporates, references, and subverts the codes common to true crime and introduce some new codes distinct to this emergent genre. I further argue that post-true crime should be evaluated not by rigid adherence to facts of a case but for its social and communal functions, in generating empathy and criticizing authority and institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judith Fathallah (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: