Phenomenological study reveals themes of human resource management and political loyalty in patronage, suggesting reforms are needed.
Aim: This phenomenological study explores factors driving the spoils system in Iran’s public organizations. Background: The spoils system, favoring political loyalty over merit, weakens governance, especially in Iran’s post-election administrative reshuffles. Method: Employing Colaizzi’s method, 17 employees from a municipality, a provincial ministry, and two state-owned enterprises in Isfahan were interviewed, following COREQ guidelines. Results: Five themes emerged: unchecked discretionary authority, weak human resource management, ineffective oversight, prevalence of anti-values, and external influences like political interference, economic sanctions, and regional disparities, highlighting systemic, cultural, and psychological roots of patronage. Conclusion: The findings enhance principal-agent theory by integrating Iran-specific dynamics, confirming patronage’s entrenched nature. Implications: Conducted as a master’s thesis, this study proposes reforms—merit-based recruitment, digital transparency tools, and ethical training—offering innovative governance solutions for developing countries facing similar challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abolfazl Razavian (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: