Qualitative study examines communication surrounding premature ovarian insufficiency, highlighting emotional wellbeing and patient reactions.
Objective: To explore the significance of a diagnosis of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency on patient experiences with the condition. Design: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis. Setting: Participants were recruited from across the UK and interviewed remotely using Microsoft Teams. Population: Sixteen women aged 18 and above with a confirmed diagnosis of POI. Methods: Participants took part in in-depth interviews exploring their experiences of living with POI, including receiving a POI diagnosis. Main Outcome Methods: Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically. Results: Three key themes were identified: (1) Delivery of information about diagnosis by healthcare professionals (2) Participants reactions to a diagnosis of POI (3) POI framed as a fertility issue only. Participants reported considerable distress when diagnoses were delivered abruptly, digitally, or without appropriate support. Conversely, face-to-face, empathetic communication was described as validating and empowering. A consistent concern was the narrow clinical framing of POI as a fertility issue, with insufficient attention paid to long-term health risks, HRT, and emotional wellbeing. Conclusion: The way in which POI is communicated has a significant and lasting impact on women's experiences and outcomes. A compassionate, holistic, and person-centred approach to diagnosis is essential. Healthcare professionals must embrace updated international guidelines, prioritise multidisciplinary care, and address existing disparities in access and support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pleace et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: