This analysis uncovers how Northern Indigenous climate fiction challenges colonial narratives, implying new understandings of resilience and survival.
This paper argues that Northern Indigenous climate fiction reframes both the Arctic region and the climate crisis, challenging settler-colonial narratives that depict the North as barren, empty, or doomed. Drawing on close readings of Sheila Watt-Cloutier’s The Right to Be Cold (2015), Tanya Tagaq’s Split Tooth (2018), and Waubgeshig Rice’s Moon of the Crusted Snow (2018), I argue that these works position the North as both a literal and symbolic barometer for climate change – an inhabited, storied, and relational space where survival is collective, intergenerational, and culturally grounded. I place these texts in dialogue with dominant, often Euro-American, climate fiction (cli-fi), which reproduces colonial tropes of the Arctic as hostile and unknowable, demonstrating how these narratives advance a counter-vision rooted in Indigenous epistemologies and lived experiences. My analysis foregrounds how Indigenous temporal frameworks – particularly spiralic and cyclical understandings of time – offer a crucial pedagogical intervention, disrupting linear, progress-oriented Western models of crisis and futurity. In Split Tooth, Tagaq’s portrayal of nuna (land) as kin collapses the human–nature divide, while Moon of the Crusted Snow reframes “apocalypse” as a recurrent historical condition rooted in colonization. Both works resist speculative depictions of survival as exceptional or futuristic, instead grounding resilience in ancestral knowledge, ecological reciprocity, and everyday acts of care – while restoring narrative authority to Indigenous communities. This paper draws on scholarship on Indigenous futurisms, decolonial environmental humanities, and the politics of genre, offering a model for reading cli-fi through place-based, Indigenous epistemologies. Ultimately, I argue that by centring Indigenous voices, Northern cli-fi not only challenges extractive and dehumanizing portrayals of the North but also redefines cli-fi itself as a genre of survivance, relational ethics, and collective futurity – offering critical lessons for climate education and conversation today.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Natalie Viebrock (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: