Analysis reports the prevalence of reactive T. cruzi antibodies in military blood donors, indicating no cases of Chagas disease.
Background Blood donors in the United States are universally screened once for Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies to prevent transfusion-transmitted Chagas disease, military donors are screened with every donation. Previous studies of military blood donors demonstrated that reactive T. cruzi antibodies were a common reason for post-donation deferral, but follow-up is unclear. This study evaluated the diagnostic evaluation of blood donors with reactive T. cruzi screening. Study Design and Methods Medical records of all blood donors at Armed Services Blood Center at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland with reactive screening for T. cruzi antibodies between January 2017 to December 2022 were evaluated after chemiluminescent immunoassay or chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay screening and enzyme strip assay supplementary testing. Records were assessed to determine diagnostic evaluation and final diagnosis of each case following initial reactive screening. Results Of 89,459 blood donors during the study period, 49 (.055%) screened reactive for T. cruzi antibodies on initial blood donation. Of those, 4 (8%) had positive and 18 (36%) had indeterminate supplementary tests. No donors met criteria for Chagas disease on clinical diagnostic testing. Of the eight who had repeat screening testing ordered in the weeks after their original reactive screen, only one (13%) had a repeat reactive screening test, but negative confirmatory serologies. Discussion While reactive T. cruzi screening occurred in this cohort, there were no cases of Chagas disease. This study demonstrates some military blood donors have transient reactivity with screening assays and future work should determine ways to safely bring these donors without Chagas disease back into the donor pool.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wells et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: