Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of Madison's opposition to the Great Compromise in relation to slavery and representation issues.
The delegates at the Constitutional Convention were trying to solve the conflict of the large and the small states through the Great Compromise, which proposed the equal distribution of the seats in the Senate, and the proportional distribution of them in the House among the states. Madison opposed the compromise, which posed a threat to his concept concerning the proportional distribution of the seats in both chambers. Raising the issue of slavery, Madison wanted to take the delegates’ mind off the conflict between the large and small states, and to highlight an even more serious problem. His intention was to urge them not to make the compromise and save his plan. According to the author, Madison mainly used the problem of slavery as a tactical device, but it does not mean that he was not aware of the real dangers of the problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Csaba Lévai (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: