Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review demonstrates how visual approximation replaces interpolation in perceptual completion, suggesting new insights into perceptual theory.
Summary Normally, the perception of complete visual shapes given incomplete sensory evidence can be explained by interpolation; i.e., by the smooth monotonic connection of literally represented contour stimuli. However, in limiting conditions (e.g., the Gerbino illusion pattern) such a connection is impossible, forcing the visual system to either violate smoothness and monotonicity constraints or relax the literal representation assumption. I review evidence that figural completion may involve visual approximation rather than interpolation, and discuss the implications of such a view for perceptual theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walter Gerbino (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: