Experimental study showed the mean scores for literature review projects were higher with computer-assisted project-based learning, indicating its potential benefits in education.
The present study compared the quality of student projects in reviewing literature from reputable journals using computer-assisted project-based learning (CPjBL) and traditional project-based learning (PjBL). This experimental study involved students from a research methodology course at a private university. Experimental group one implemented CPjBL, and experimental group two applied PjBL. The analysis results showed a mean score of 76.41, a standard deviation value of 9.105 for CPjBL, a mean score of 69.78, and a standard deviation value of 9.983 for PjBL. These results suggest that while the mean score of CPjBL was higher than that of PjBL, the difference was insignificant. In conclusion, in a research methodology course, CPjBL is suitable for helping students generate research ideas by optimizing software to review literature from reputable journals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muzaini et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: