P-curve method shows improved effect size estimation over trim-and-fill, highlighting potential biases.
I like p-curve analyses. They are a great tool to evaluate whether sets of studies have evidential value or not. In a recent paper, Simonsohn, Nelson, & Simmons (2014) show how p-curve analyses can correct for publication bias using only significant results. That’s pretty cool. However, trim-and-fill is notoriously bad at unbiased effect size estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniël Lakens (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: