This evaluation challenges conventional threshold theories for pesticide regulation, suggesting better models for human health outcomes.
The scientific discipline of toxicology is based heavily on the theory of thresholds, or that toxic chemicals can be regulated to specific levels in order to prevent human populations from experiencing adverse effects. However, I contend that, in light of recent research, this threshold concept is inadequate for pesticide regulation and thus new tools and models are needed to determine safe exposure levels. For the sake of industrial economics and politics, human health is being knowingly compromised— with the grave potential to impact generations and perpetuate injustice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard L. Post (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: