This analysis explores how secularisation impacts political and religious dynamics, indicating its complex role in society.
There is a normative position to designate secularisation thesis purely apolitical entity; and this article attempts to shed light on this mountain high debate to understand the extent to which secularisation can be called a complete separation of the religious and political. This article argues that since both religion and politics are not completely apolitical entities, therefore the complete separation of secularisation thesis has not been achieved. Maintaining the historical differentiations and cultural contexts of different countries, this research says that secularisation is best to understood from contextual and localised perspectives. Secularisation thesis does not even need to be understood as a complete separation, instead it is a process to establish an inclusive society through establishing religious freedom for all. Besides, this research also contributed in the epistemological realm through providing an alternative lens of studying secularisation and showed how this approach can help to study different genres of secularism practised in the USA, France and Bangladesh
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Md. Didarul Islam (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: