This analysis reveals how the dialectic informs reflexivity and historiography, suggesting ongoing implications.
After speculation that the dialectic is as yet unrealized, a kind of “unfinished project,” three areas in which the dialectic remains alive are oudined: 1) in reflexivity, in which the theory of ideology demands to be confronted with the contemporary theory and experience of “multiple subject positions”; 2) in historiography, in which the dialectic is not a philosophical position but a critical operation performed on traditional historical narrative; and, finally, 3) in contradiction, a structure the dialectic does not posit, but causes to emerge and to become visible in familiar and seemingly unproblematical situations (Brecht's “estrangement effect”).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fredric Jameson (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: