This analysis shows high patient satisfaction and spectacle independence in 68 eyes after lens implantation, indicating effective visual quality results.
To evaluate visual and refractive outcomes, visual quality, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence 3 months after phacoemulsification with bilateral non-diffractive enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) lens implantation. This study included 68 eyes of 34 consecutive patients, with 51.5% undergoing refractive lens exchange and 48.5% undergoing cataract surgery. Exclusion criteria included previous ocular surgery, corneal higher order aberrations greater than 0.6 μm, and corneal astigmatism greater than 1.50 diopters (D). Mini-monovision of -0.50 D was targeted. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity was measured at 4 m and 66 and 40 cm. Patient satisfaction was assessed using subjective questionnaires. Modulation transfer function, Strehl ratio, and objective depth of focus were measured with ray-tracing. At 3 months, the follow-up rate was 97.1% and mean corrected distance visual acuity at 4 m and 66 and 40 cm was -0.02 ± 0.10, 0.11 ± 0.11, and 0.36 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), respectively. Monocular defocus curve was higher than 0.20 logMAR from +1.50 to -1.50 D. Mean Objective Scatter Index score at 3 months was 1.48 ± 0.72; it decreased significantly in eyes with cataract and increased significantly in eyes that had refractive lens exchange (P < .05). Spectacle independence was achieved by 95%, 100%, and 34% patients for far, intermediate, and near distances, respectively; 90% patients reported no photic phenomena. Patients were satisfied with daily life activities not requiring near vision. Bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive EDOF lens resulted in good visual performance at far and intermediate distances, with functional near vision at 3 months postoperatively. Patient satisfaction and spectacle independence were high.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Danasoury et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: