PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 2025

A quantitative process evaluation of a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a co-designed cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for people with type 1 diabetes and disordered eating (steady trial): Auditing treatment integrity and delivery.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AHAmy HarrisonNZNatalie ZarembaJBJennie Brown

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Quantitative analysis reveals treatment integrity in a randomised controlled trial for type 1 diabetes, suggesting future scaling for broader access.

Key Points

  • Competent treatment was delivered with a mean Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale score of 3.81, highlighting adherence to the cognitive behavioural therapy framework.
  • The study utilized a variety of tools from the STEADY toolkit, with CBT formulation being the most frequently used tool during the intervention.
  • Delivery of the STEADY intervention took an average of 153.3 days, indicating a need for flexibility in session timing for participants.
  • Findings support the feasibility of scaling the STEADY intervention for a multi-site randomised controlled trial, enhancing accessibility for diverse populations.

Cite This Study

Harrison et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c93fe601120bef803bae31https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70124
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share