PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 20258 citations

Association of Eating Window With Mortality Among US Adults: Insights From a Nationally Representative Study.

View Full Paper
ZMZiling MaoHGHaley GrantSKStephen B. Kritchevsky

Key Points

  • Eating window influences mortality rates, with moderate windows linked to the lowest risk.
  • Participants with shorter eating windows experienced over 30% higher all-cause mortality.
  • Cohort analysis based on NHANES data identified U-shaped relationships between eating duration and health.
  • Findings indicate personalized dietary advice may benefit older adults and those with higher mortality risk.

Abstract

Time-based diets have gained popularity for their health benefits, but their effects on human longevity remain unclear, with most evidence from short-term human trials and animal studies. We determined the associations between eating window and mortality among U.S. adults. We conducted a prospective cohort study using NHANES 2003-2018 data linked to mortality records through December 2019. The analytic sample included 33,052 adults (aged 20 and above) with two complete 24-h dietary recalls collected at baseline. Eating window was defined as the time between first and last consumption of any food/beverage containing > 0 kcal within 24 h. We used survey-weighted Cox regression with Restricted Cubic Splines (RCS) to model nonlinear associations, treating eating window as both a continuous and categorical variable ( 50% higher cardiovascular mortality in older adults, men, and Whites. Longer eating window categories (≥ 15 h/day) were associated with 25% higher all-cause mortality (95% CI: 1.01-1.55). Moderate eating windows (~11-12 h/day) are linked to the lowest mortality risk, with deviations associated with higher risk. Differences across demographic groups highlight the need for personalized guidance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mao et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c93fe601120bef803baf37https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.70230
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper