Exploratory investigation shows improved knowledge and communication among junior endurance athletes and coaches.
To investigate the effects of a tailored educational session about the menstrual cycle (MC) and hormonal contraceptives (HCs) on perceived knowledge, knowledge satisfaction, communication, and the coach-athlete relationship among junior endurance athletes and their coaches. Junior female cross-country skiers and biathletes (n = 36) and their coaches (n = 12) completed 2 questionnaires within an 8-week interval (PRE-POST). After 2 weeks, the intervention group (20 athletes and 6 coaches) participated in a tailored educational session designed to enhance their knowledge about the MC and HCs. The control group (16 athletes and 6 coaches) received no education on this topic. Athletes and coaches in the intervention group experienced significant PRE-POST increases in perceived knowledge (estimate = 1.28, P = .002) and satisfaction (estimate = 1.20, P < .001) with their knowledge of the MC and HCs compared to the control group. Coaches had higher perceived knowledge (estimate = 1.45, P = .003) and satisfaction (estimate = 0.83, P = .041) with their knowledge of the MC than athletes. The intervention improved the degree of communication with peers (estimate = 1.02, P = .013) but not with the other role (ie, athletes' communication with coaches and vice versa; estimate = 0.12, P = .833). In addition, it improved perceived ease of communication (estimate = 0.93, P = .003). The intervention did not seem to affect the coach-athlete relationship (P > .005). The educational session resulted in promising effects on perceived knowledge and satisfaction with athletes' and coaches' knowledge of the MC/HCs, while also facilitating communication among athletes. Future studies should focus on implementing and evaluating more longitudinal interventions with larger sample sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: