Randomized trial assesses low-dose rituximab's effectiveness compared to modified ponticelli regimen in primary membranous nephropathy, indicating safety benefits.
Background The modified Ponticelli regimen (mPR) with cyclical steroids and cyclophosphamide is first-line therapy for primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). While low-dose rituximab (RTX) has been effective in inducing remission in PMN, there is a paucity of head-to-head trials comparing it with the first-line regimen. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of low-dose RTX compared with Mpr in PMN. Materials and Methods In this single-center study, 68 patients with PMN and nephrotic syndrome were randomly assigned to receive either two doses of RTX (500 mg) given 15 days apart or mPR. Results 15/34 patients (44.12%) in the RTX group and 17/34 patients (50%) in the mPR group had achieved the primary outcome of partial or complete remission at 6 months (Risk difference RD -5.88%, 95% confidence interval CI = -29.57 to 17.80%, p = 0.578). At 12 months, remission rate was 59.27% in the RTX arm and 69.57% in the mPR arm (Risk difference -10.31%, 95% CI = -36.71 to 16.09%, p = 0.444). Adverse events (P = 0.007), including leukopenia, infections, and hyperglycemia, were significantly more frequent in the mPR arm. CD19 + ve B-cells were suppressed by 1 month in all patients at this rituximab dose, but 64% had recovery by 6 months. Conclusion This pilot study suggested that low-dose RTX could achieve sufficient B-cell suppression and short-term remission rates comparable to mPR with fewer adverse events. It demonstrates the feasibility and safety of low-dose RTX in PMN. Further studies with larger cohorts are required to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suresh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: