Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis finds ownership concentration moderates the value-relevance of earnings and book values, indicating important implications for financial reporting.
Purpose Ownership of a firm might be concentrated (i.e. a small number of large shareholders) or dispersed (i.e. a large number of small shareholders). Differences in ownership structure can affect the amount and quality of public information about a firm and moderate the value-relevance of reported financial information. We investigate how ownership concentration moderates the value-relevance of book values and earnings. Design/methodology/approach Inferences are derived from a multivariate regression approach, using 361 listed South African firms reporting from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019. Findings More concentrated ownership is associated with lower value-relevance of high-quality earnings. More importantly, ownership concentration that deviates from expectations (abnormal ownership concentration) is associated with lower value-relevance of high-quality earnings and higher value-relevance of book values, irrespective of whether ownership concentration is abnormally high or abnormally low. Research limitations/implications Abnormal ownership concentration weakens the association between high financial reporting quality and capital market outcomes. Therefore, optimising ownership structure deserves attention equal to increasing financial reporting quality. Originality/value The key insight of this paper is that the absolute level of ownership concentration matters less than its deviation from expected levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badenhorst et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: