PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025International Journal of Molecular Sciences8 citationsOpen Access

Assessing Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety

View Full Paper
KGKyriakos GoulasMMMartin MuellerAEAristomenis K. Exadaktylos

Key Points

  • Monoclonal antibodies did not significantly reduce mortality in sepsis, highlighting limited effectiveness in broader cohorts.
  • IVIG enriched for Immunoglobulin M showed consistent mortality reduction when administered early in hyperinflammatory phases.
  • Emerging antibody strategies such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 have shown promise in improving organ-support-free days in sepsis.
  • Systematic review reveals the need for adaptive trial designs and biomarker-guided therapies to enhance personalized treatment.

Abstract

This systematic review critically evaluates the efficacy and safety of monoclonal (mAb) and polyclonal (pAb) antibody therapies in adult sepsis and septic shock by synthesizing data from 29 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing over 10,000 patients. Sepsis and septic shock continue to be major critical-care mortality causes worldwide because of simultaneous hyperinflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. The clinical results from using targeted antibody therapies to manage this dysregulated response have shown inconsistent results. We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (through February 2025) to identify RCTs that compared mAb and pAb treatments to placebo or standard care in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock. Monoclonal antibodies against single cytokines e.g., Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) and endotoxin, did not significantly reduce 28-day mortality in unselected cohorts, though subgroup analyses of patients with elevated Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or early septic shock showed trends toward benefit. Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) enriched for Immunoglobulin M (IgM) demonstrated the most consistent mortality reduction when administered early in hyperinflammatory phases. Emerging precision strategies—including checkpoint inhibitors targeting Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 inhibitors (anti–PD-1/PD-L1), complement component 5a inhibitors (anti–C5a), and anti–adrenomedullin—were safe and improved organ-support-free days and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. According to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, evidence showed moderate confidence for mortality, high certainty for safety and low to moderate certainty for secondary outcomes. The use of broad single-target monoclonal treatments has failed to deliver significant improvements in sepsis patient outcomes. The most promising approaches for sepsis treatment involve biomarker-guided precision strategies and polyclonal IgM-enriched IVIG. Future sepsis trials need to implement rapid immune profiling and adaptive designs and combination regimens to achieve optimal efficacy and establish personalized guideline-based sepsis management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Goulas et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a3731b076d99fa5371ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26188859
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sepsis syndrome1989 · 540 citations
  2. 2Intravenous immunoglobulins in association with antibiotics1988 · 75 citations
  3. 3RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials2019 · 32,821 citations
  4. 4The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 104,483 citations
  5. 5Recent advances of precision immunotherapy in sepsis2025 · 22 citations