PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2025JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery8 citations

Barriers and Timely Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer

View Full Paper
MNMegan T. NguyenEKEmily Kistner‐GriffinRDReid DeMass

Key Points

  • Only 41% of patients received timely postoperative radiation therapy after surgery, emphasizing the need for immediate intervention to enhance patient outcomes.
  • The presence of multiple barriers significantly decreases the odds of initiating timely postoperative radiation therapy, with a 76% reduction for those facing 5 or more barriers.
  • The study employed a prospective cohort design across a US academic medical center, gathering data from patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma post-surgery.
  • Findings highlight the necessity of addressing care coordination to minimize delays in postoperative radiation therapy initiation and improve overall patient care.

Abstract

Importance Initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery is associated with improved outcomes among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the relationship of barriers to care with timely PORT is unknown. Objective To categorize barriers to timely PORT, evaluate the association of barriers to care with initiation of timely PORT, and describe the primary reason for delay among patients without timely PORT. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study at a US academic medical center included adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative-intent surgery with an indication for PORT. Patients were recruited for the study from May 19, 2020, to November 6, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was initiation of timely PORT, defined as starting radiation therapy within 6 weeks of surgery. Barriers to PORT were prospectively collected via patient self-report and the electronic health record. Among patients who did not start PORT within 6 weeks of surgery, the primary reason for delay was defined as the singular barrier category that most directly led to the delay. Results Among 78 patients (mean SD age, 61.5 10.8 years; 54 males 69.2%), 32 patients (41%) initiated PORT within 6 weeks of surgery, and 46 patients (59%) did not initiate PORT within 6 weeks of surgery. Each additional barrier was associated with a decreased odds of initiating timely PORT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81 95% CI, 0.63-1.01); patients with 5 or more barriers had a 76% reduction in the odds of starting PORT within 6 weeks of surgery relative to those with 0 to 2 barriers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24 95 CI%, 0.06-0.84) on multivariable analysis. When analyzed by barrier category, patients with a perioperative adverse effects–related barrier were less likely to initiate timely PORT than patients without a perioperative adverse effects barrier (adjusted odds ratio, 0.17 95% CI, 0.04-0.66) on multivariable analysis. Among patients without timely PORT, the most common primary reason for delay was a barrier related to poor care coordination (19/46 41.3%). Conclusions and Relevance In this prospective cohort study, patients with a greater number of barriers and those with a barrier related to the perioperative adverse effects category were less likely to initiate timely PORT. Among patients without timely PORT, the most common primary reason for delay was a barrier related to poor care coordination. Efforts to improve timely PORT should focus on decreasing the number of barriers, improving surgical quality, and enhancing care coordination.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nguyen et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d44a4031b076d99fa537achttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.2824
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper