This research reveals effective control methods for multi-agent systems under Denial-of-Service attacks, implying improved system resilience.
For multi-agent systems under Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks, a relative threshold strategy for event triggering and a state-constrained control method with prescribed performance are proposed. Within the framework of combining graph theory with the leader–follower approach, coordinate transformation is utilized to decouple the multi-agent system. Inspired by the three-way handshake technology of TCP communication, a DoS detection system is designed based on event-triggering. This system is used to detect DoS attacks, prevent the impacts brought by DoS attacks, and reduce the update frequency of the controller. Fuzzy logic systems are employed to approximate the unknown nonlinear functions within the system. By using a first-order filter to approximate the derivative of the virtual controller, the computational complexity issue in the backstepping method is addressed. Furthermore, The Barrier Lyapunov Function (BLF) possesses unique mathematical properties. When the system state approaches the pre-set boundary, it can exhibit a special variation trend, thereby imposing a restrictive effect on the system state. The Prescribed Performance Function (PPF), on the other hand, defines the expected performance standards that the system aims to achieve in the tracking task, covering key indicators such as tracking accuracy and response speed. By organically integrating these two functions, the system can continuously monitor and adjust its own state during operation. When there is a tendency for the tracking error to deviate from the specified range, the combined function mechanism will promptly come into play. Through the reasonable adjustment of the system’s control input, it ensures that the tracking error always remains within the pre-specified range. Finally, through Lyapunov analysis, the proposed control protocol ensures that all closed-loop signals remain bounded under attacks, with the outputs of all followers synchronizing with the leader’s output in the communication graph.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: